While you were preoccupied with the Senate hearing on Judge Kavanaugh, the following happened:
The President of the United States, Donald Trump, was laughed at while addressing the United Nations. That was on September 26th.
On the previous day, Mrs. Theresa May was scorned at a summit of European Union members. The other 27 leaders turned their backs on her.
The German Defense Minister announced that the new European Defense Force is ready for action, and could replace NATO.
But none of these news items could be fitted into our national news programs – sexual scandals must always come first, especially if they undermine the Republicans.
The “trial” of the nominated Supreme Court judge was disturbing, to say the least. Whatever happened to “innocent until proven guilty?” If the Guinness Book of World Records had an entry for the most illogical statements made at any one event, the Kavanaugh hearings would have everybody else beat! His accuser was found credible, but no proof was offered; while others (witnesses) could not remember anything. This did not stop hundreds of women from insisting he was guilty because they were sexually harassed at some time in their own lives!!! As in a Kafkaesque nightmarish novel, it was a case of guilty until proven innocent.
When Kavanaugh defended accusations against him, he said he was a virgin until he got married (at least he implied that). One commentator reacted by saying this was “Weird!” What sort of a society have we become?
Of course, the real issue, the elephant in the committee room, was not mentioned. The deep fear of all those accusing Judge Kavanaugh is that another conservative appointed to the bench would give the court a conservative majority, that could reverse the 1973 decision of the Supreme Court, Roe v Wade – the ruling that made abortion legal and led to the murders of 61 million innocent babies.
“As malignant as were the campaigns against Supreme Court nominees Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas, even they didn’t face accusations as vile and unrelenting as the unsubstantiated charges against Brett Kavanaugh. Adding to the injustice is that the frenzy surrounding his nomination isn’t really about him.
“It’s about Roe v Wade. The 1973 Supreme Court decision upended the laws of all 50 states on behalf of a constitutional right to abortion the Constitution somehow neglects to mention. Since then, the advocates of a living Constitution posit that while our Founding document is infinitely malleable, this one ruling is fixed and sacred.” (“Destroying Brett Kavanaugh,” by William McGurn, WSJ, 10/2).
Not only did the Founding Fathers have no intention of allowing abortion, the idea did not enter our culture until the twentieth century, as a direct consequence of embracing Darwin’s Theory of Evolution, introduced in 1859. You can read about the slow progression in thinking in the book “From Darwin to Hitler,” by Richard Weikart, 2004. I doubt that any of America’s founding fathers even thought about abortion, let alone intended for abortion-on-demand to be included in the constitution!
61 MILLION LIVES LOST
I am not endorsing Senator Rand Paul when I quote from a recent letter (September 4th) on the subject of abortion:
“For 45 years, nine unelected men and women on the Supreme Court have played God with innocent human life. They have invented laws that condemned to painful deaths without trial more than 61 million babies for the crime of being “inconvenient” . . . Now the time to grovel before the Supreme Court is over.”
At the same time as killing 61 million (mostly white) babies, we have allowed into the country about the same number of people, mostly of different cultures, some even posing a threat to our very existence. Where’s the sense in this population replacement program? Before it goes any further, it needs to be stopped.
The figure of 61 million refers solely to America. There’s also Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, France, Germany and the rest of the West. All these nations have pursued a policy of national suicide! The world is becoming more and more dangerous and we seem to be heading for a monumental clash of civilizations, predicted by Samuel Huntington in his book “The Coming Clash of Civilizations,” published in 1992. As the number of whites is declining, thanks partly to abortion, while other races increase in number, the threat to western civilization increases! It may be too late to save the West, but we can start by reversing Roe v Wade, and similar decisions made in other western nations.
I’ve heard Christians say that there’s never been a better time to be an American than now. Can these two be reconciled? Can we really say it’s a great time to be an American when so many innocents are being killed, in the name of CONVENIENCE?
That decision, together with the 1965 Immigration Act, are responsible for the POPULATION REPLACEMENT policy that has been going on for five decades. Whereas fifty years ago, whites in America were almost 90% of the population, today they are less than 60% and headed for oblivion.
Our grandchildren have a weakness for Cadbury’s chocolate fingers. Not wanting them to develop any addictions, they have only been an occasional treat.
A few months ago, I bought them for less than $3. When I looked for them again a few days ago, they had gone up to $6.75.
The only reason I can think of to explain that jump is an increased tariff on imported chocolate (they are produced in the United Kingdom). The dispute is between the US and the EU, of which the UK remains a member for another seven months. Hopefully, after Brexit the price will come down.
Yesterday, I checked at WalMart, where I got them for less than $3 earlier this year. They are no longer selling them. They have also stopped selling Tim Tams from Australia.
Armageddon must be close – that’s all I can say!
Request: if anybody lives in the Cincinnati area, could they please check availability and price next time they visit Jungle Jim’s?
207 DAYS LEFT UNTIL BREXIT
Talking of Brexit (and food), you would think the British didn’t eat before they joined the European Union.
Those opposed to leaving the 27-nation EU are attempting to scare the general population, saying that there will be food shortages and their prescriptions may no longer be available.
For the record, the United Kingdom was the world’s most successful trading nation in Victorian times. They continued as a major trader right up until they entered the EU in 1973.
Prior to that ill-informed decision, major trading partners included the Commonwealth (former British territories), the United States and EFTA (European countries that were not a part of the EU). Food was a lot cheaper than it is now. The UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and South Africa had a preferential trading agreement, which ensured cheap food for the mother country and gave preference for British exports. Withdrawing from this agreement was one of the biggest mistakes Britain ever made.
The UK cannot sign any new trading agreements until after leaving the EU. When they do, expect food prices to drop. It is, of course, possible that the cost of French cheeses and German wines may rise, but, believe it or not, you can live without them! (My grandchildren, deprived of Cadbury’s fingers, are surviving!)
From the WSJ yesterday:
WSJ Brexit Beyond
Britain Ramps Up Preparations for No-Deal Brexit: The U.K. government on Thursday published advice for British businesses on how to prepare for an abrupt and messy break with the European Union, a move aimed at underscoring to Brussels that it is serious about walking away from talks if it doesn’t get a satisfactory deal.
Of note: The Wall Street Journal has a regular “Brexit and Beyond” column. They have now added a sub-title: “Europe in Flux.”
POLITICAL TURMOIL AFFLICTS ANGLO COUNTRIES
Thanks to Brexit, there’s a great deal of political instability in the UK right now. Theresa May seems unlikely to be able to deliver a “deal” with the EU, while satisfying those who want to leave. Attempting to do so is really a contradiction!
According to one paper earlier this week, over 100 Conservative MPs are ready to rebel over this. That could mean a coup against Mrs. May, replacing her with somebody more to their liking. Boris Johnson is still the favorite. Mr. Johnson is more conservative than Mrs. May and does not want to compromise with the EU.
Don’t assume this won’t happen. I woke up this morning to find a similar “coup” took place in Australia on Friday (the day is already over in the Antipodes). Malcolm Turnbull, leader of the governing Liberal Party (the Conservative Party of Australia) has been ousted and replaced with Scott Morrison. The latter is more conservative than the former.
Canada is also going through some political turmoil, as Maxime Bernier is quitting the Conservative Party and forming his own party dedicated to “more freedom, less government.” In recent weeks, he has launched Twitter attacks against PM Justin Trudeau’s “extreme multiculturalism” and immigration policy, according to the BBC’s website this morning.
Mr. Trudeau, the country’s prime minister, is a Liberal who has welcomed thousands of Muslim refugees from the Middle East. The Conservatives remain in opposition, with an election expected late next year.
The UK, Canada and Australia all share a common heritage and remain members of the Commonwealth. With a very different political system, the United States is also going through a great deal of internal turmoil after two of President Trump’s former political associates were found to be breaking the law. The implication is that the president did likewise. Calls for his impeachment are growing. I don’t think this will happen as the Republicans control both houses in Congress and President Trump has a very loyal support base.
GERMANY’S CONTINUED RISE TO WORLD PROMINENCE
“The Lord says: I am furious! And I will use the King of Assyria as a club.” (Isa. 10:5; Contemporary English Version).
From Time magazine:
Europe should scale up military spending in order to act as a counterpoint to an unpredictable and unreliable United States, the German foreign minister said in an op-ed Wednesday, an unusually forthright criticism of U.S. foreign policy by a senior political figure in Europe.
In the German newspaper Handelsblatt entitled “A New World Order,” Heiko Maas said that Europe and the U.S. have been drifting apart for years. Instead of waiting for Trump’s presidency to end, he argued, Europe should take an “equal share of responsibility” globally.
Yet Maas joined in agreement with Trump in demanding NATO members increase their defense spending. “It is in our own interest to strengthen the European part of the North Atlantic Alliance,” he wrote. However, he continued, this was “not because Donald Trump is always setting new percentage targets, but because we can no longer rely on Washington to the same extent.” (Germany’s Foreign Minister: when the US ‘crosses the line,” Europe must act,” by Billy Perrigo.)
From Deutsche Welle:
Germany on track for world’s largest trade surplus for third consecutive year. Deutsche Welle * 21 Aug 2018
The country’s $299 billion surplus is poised to attract criticism, however, both at home and internationally.
Germany is expected to set a €264 billion ($299 billion) trade surplus this year, far more than its closest export rivals Japan and the Netherlands, according to research published Monday by Munich-based economic research institute Ifo.
GERMANY BLAMES TRUMP TARIFFS FOR DESTROYING ECONOMY — MINISTER IN FURIOUS RANT (headline in Daily Express; article by Paul Withers, 8/20)
“The US President has triggered a bitter trade war with the likes of Europe, China and Canada by imposing huge import tariffs on a number of goods, including steel and aluminum.
He has accused them of unfair trade practices and insists the tariffs are aimed at protecting American jobs.
“Speaking to German newspaper Bild am Sonntag, Economy Minister Peter Altmaier took aim at the US President, claiming consumers were taking the brunt of his import tariffs because they are driving up prices.
He said: “This trade war is slowing down and destroying economic growth – and it creates new uncertainties.”
A NUCLEAR GERMANY?
German bomb debate goes nuclear
The security community has become unnerved in the face of Donald Trump’s threats, and some are thinking the unthinkable.
“It’s crucial for Germany and Europe that we have a strategic debate” — Ulrike Franke, analyst with the European Council on Foreign Relations
BERLIN — Imagine a nuclear-armed Germany (first line of article – (Matthew Karnitschnig, 8/6, Politico)
Headline in the Singapore Straits Times: “Can Germany and Japan replace the United States?”
We had all nine grandchildren in the house last week, Monday through Friday. Hence, the lack of a blog post a week ago. Visits to the grocery store were frequent, as was taking them places. There was no time to write, or even watch the news.
After our mini-family reunion, I really hope they will want to see each other after my wife and I are no longer around to host the gathering. I’m sure they will!
I was struck (again) by how much louder the five younger ones, all boys, were, than their four older female sisters and cousins. Noise, noise, noise! Can’t boys do anything quietly? Clearly not.
I found myself walking through the daily debris silently reminding myself that “children are a blessing!” They certainly are and I’m already looking forward to when we can all be together again.
THEN AND NOW
When everybody was gone, I started reading Boris Johnson’s “The Churchill Factor: How one man made history.”
You may have heard of Boris Johnson. He’s sometimes been described as “Britain’s Donald Trump.” On his recent visit to England, Trump expressed the opinion that Boris would make “a great prime minister.” A poll earlier this week showed him to be the favorite to succeed Theresa May. Donald Trump and Boris Johnson have known each other for some time and are good friends.
Boris served two terms as a very successful Mayor of London. More recently, he was Britain’s Foreign Secretary, the equivalent of Secretary of State.
He resigned a few weeks ago over Brexit. His objection, supported by many, is that Mrs. May, the Prime Minister, seems to want to compromise with the European Union. This would not deliver the Brexit (total independence) from the EU that was promised after the referendum over two years ago. There is still no agreement between the UK and the EU over future trade. Boris Johnson’s point is that the United Kingdom doesn’t need one – that new trade deals can be signed after breaking away from Brussels. Have faith – it will all work out.
I must admit to sympathy with his stance. Get out quick. Don’t hesitate.
His book on Churchill was written a few years ago and published in 2014. I’m now reading chapter 17 (there are 23 chapters). The chapter is titled “The Wooing of America” and details Churchill’s relationship with Franklin Roosevelt. His single-minded mission was to bring the United States into the war against Hitler. At their first wartime meeting, the two leaders were concerned that Hitler had recently invaded Russia. But Churchill knew that after Russia, he would come after Britain; and that if Britain fell and Hitler sank the Royal Navy, America would be next. The whole world would very quickly descend into the barbarism of fascism.
A lot was at stake when they met in Newfoundland on August 10th, 1941. This was the handshake that was to change the history of the twentieth century.
“As he stretches out that elegant white hand he knows he is reaching for his only lifeline; and yet there is nothing about him to convey the gloom of his position. On the contrary, his face is suddenly wreathed in smiles, babyish, irresistible.
“Roosevelt smiles back; they grip hands, for ages, each reluctant to be the first to let go, and for the next two days Churchill maintains his schmoozathon. We don’t know exactly what they say to each other at the first such Atlantic conference — the direct ancestor of NATO; but we know that Churchill lays it on thick. His mission is to build up a sense of common destiny; to work with the grain of Roosevelt’s natural instincts, and to turn the USA from distant sympathizers into full-blown allies in bloodshed.” (page 235)
This was a family reunion, only the second time a President of the United States had shaken the hand of a British prime minister in office. 160 years after Yorktown. 160 years after the United States had separated itself from the rest of the English speaking world. Now the two branches of the Anglo-Saxon world (the two sons of Joseph) were to be united in a common purpose. They met in Canada, the oldest Dominion of the British Empire, a nation founded by Loyalists at the end of the Revolutionary War. The alliance that was forming has remained the foundation of global peace and order for 77 years.
As I read Johnson’s book, I could see parallels with today. There’s no fighting this time (not yet, anyway), but once again Britain is trying to free itself from European despotism, as it has so often in history. There are those, like the current prime minister, who want to compromise; but others, like Boris Johnson, who are in a Churchillian mood, wanting to raise two fingers to the German-dominated EU (the two fingers were “V for Victory” in WWII, but, reversed, they have another meaning in England, which you will have to Google!)
History may repeat itself.
Confidence in Mrs. May is waning. The Opposition Labour Party is scandalizing Britain with its anti-semitism. The smaller parties are not credible. An internal coup in the Conservative Party could replace Mrs. May with Boris Johnson, just as Chamberlain was replaced with Winston Churchill.
There’s another analogy.
Mr. Trump repeated a commitment to Mrs. May that the US will offer a free trade deal to the United Kingdom when Britain leaves the EU. (EU rules mean that no deal can be signed until D-Day on 29th March next year; D for Departure!) American farmers, losing markets in the current trade dispute with the EU, will benefit from a new trade deal with the UK; Britain will benefit with plentiful supplies of cheap food.
Once again, the New World may come to the aid of the Old.
Once again, a family reunion could make a big difference in the world.
There’s another lesson from Churchill’s meeting with FDR. After the historic meeting of president and prime minister, there was a “divine service” on the Sunday morning. Sailors of the two nations sang hymns together – “chosen by Churchill – that express that single heritage: two broadly Protestant nations bound together against a vile and above all a pagan regime.” (pages 235-6)
This was just a few weeks after the National Day of Prayer called by King George VI during Dunkirk.
At such a critical time, today’s leaders should follow the example of their predecessors and ask God for divine help through a very challenging time.
BEWARE OF CHINESE TIES
Britain is keen for a sweet deal with China after Brexit – but watch out for Beijing’s ‘debt-trap diplomacy’, says Michael Auslin. For decades we’ve heard dire warnings about China’s growing military power, but these doom-mongers have missed the point. China isn’t on the war path. Where old empires would start by invading, it starts by trading. Only when an economy has become dependent on trade does Beijing begin to demand more, with the aim of creating an ever-expanding ‘Greater China’ in its near abroad. (Freddy Gray, The Spectator, 8/2)
FARMERS IN CRISIS
There’s increasing talk of land redistribution in South Africa, the wealthiest nation on the African continent. It’s been almost a quarter of a century since the end of apartheid, a period in which few black South Africans have seen any benefits. A wealthy elite has been created through corruption at the highest level, but little has been done to help the average person.
Neighboring Zimbabwe confiscated land from white farmers at the turn of this century. The result was mass starvation, the collapse of the currency and economic chaos.
The European farmers who colonized southern Africa in the nineteenth century brought a great deal of development to the region. Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) was the ‘breadbasket of Africa;” now, after almost forty years of independence, it’s the “basket case of Africa.” The white farmers who once dominated Rhodesia were “commercial farmers,” similar to their American and Canadian counter-parts. African farmers are “subsistence” farmers, who just grow enough food for their own families. This is a major cultural difference the world does not understand. Confiscating white farmland can only have one consequence – a dramatic drop in food production (Zimbabwe saw a 90% drop, with a consequent famine).
Farmers in South Africa are being murdered at an alarming rate. Many have chosen to leave the country. Western Australia is one area that is attracting them. Other parts of Africa are offering the farmers 99-year leases to boost their own agricultural production. Even Russia is encouraging them to relocate.
Other farmers from Europe moved to North America, Australia and New Zealand in the nineteenth century. These commercial farmers produce a disproportionate percentage of the world’s food. Higher tariffs on agricultural produce could affect this, along with changes in the weather and massive fires that seem to be a permanent fixture of our landscape. All of these threaten today’s farmers.
Zimbabwe’s woes never seem to end. The “first free election” held at the weekend, has been followed by riots and violence as the losing party claims to have won. It’s not possible to determine who really won, but after 38 years, ZANU-PF is still in power. Most people will not be surprised.
Prior to Zimbabwe, Rhodesia had elections for decades without any violence. Zimbabwe has not been able to achieve that. As is the case elsewhere in Africa, tribalism and corruption have led to democracy being compromised. Zimbabwe’s first leader, Robert Mugabe, was in power for almost 38 years, leading a very corrupt regime.
It’s doubtful there will be any significant change.
First came Brexit; followed by Donald Trump four months later.
Both showed that voters wanted significant change. Both are considered populist. Two years later, Britain and America, once the most stable nations in the world, are now in turmoil. Their friends and allies are in confusion.
Mrs. May’s Conservative government could fall at any time. She survived this week and things are likely to quiet down with the summer recess, but with only a few months until the United Kingdom leaves the European Union, there’s going to be more turmoil ahead.
There is little reporting on Brexit in the United States. Americans don’t realize how important it is. The best analogy is this: California has voted to leave the United States, effective March 29th 2019. The vote was over two years ago, but there’s still no agreement on trade between California and the other 49 states and time is running out. What about passports? Residence rights – can Californians remain in the other states after 3/29? Can people from Michigan remain in California if they own a home and work there?
It’s almost unthinkable. So is Brexit, except that it’s less than fifty years since the UK was a fully independent country outside of the EU (then the EEC, the European Economic Community).
It gets more complicated.
The referendum of June 2016 was a free vote. Many Conservative MPs (Members of Parliament) voted to “Leave,” but many voted to “Remain.” Members of the other political parties mostly voted to “Remain” in the EU.
73% of all MP’s support continued membership of the EU, including 56% of Conservatives. But they are bound by the referendum result when 51.9% of the electorate voted to Leave, 48.1% Remain. Voter turnout was 72.21%, meaning that just over one third of British voters wanted to stay in the EU. Parliament is clearly not in step with the people. British democracy is at risk here.
David Cameron, the Prime Minister who presided over the vote, resigned. He voted to “Remain;” as did Theresa May, his successor, who is now trying to deliver Brexit. Although she is committed to honoring the will of the people and intends for Britain to leave Europe, she is clearly “hugging the coast” and wants as close a relationship as possible. She made things more difficult for herself last year when she called for a General Election, resulting in a minority government, which is propped up by a party from Northern Ireland.
On Friday, 6th July, the Cabinet met at the Prime Minister’s country home of Chequers to discuss the way forward. They drew up plans for further negotiations with the EU. Since then, a number of party leaders have resigned, including the Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson, and the chief Brexit negotiator, David Davis. Both men accused Mrs. May of wanting a compromise. Mrs May has had twelve frontbenchers resign since the election last year.
Visiting US President Donald Trump was in the UK a week later and got involved by stating that if the UK does not break away from Europe completely, the US may not be able to give the country a trade deal. If Britain were bound in some way to EU trade regulations, it would complicate a trade deal with America. Mr. Trump also said that he thought that Mr. Johnson, a close personal friend, would make a great prime minister.
Boris Johnson gave a Churchillian speech in parliament on Wednesday on why he resigned, criticizing Mrs. May and claiming that Brexit can be saved. Mr. Johnson has made a point of saying that the British have lost the confidence needed to go it alone. He claims that May’s proposals would lead to Britain becoming a “colony” of the German led EU. A poll yesterday by “Westmonster” showed that, given a choice between Johnson or May, 93% of voters would support Mr. Johnson. (“Westmonster” is similar to Breitbart.)
It’s reminiscent of the late 1930’s, with a weak, compromising Prime Minister (Chamberlain / May) and one voice defying Europe (Winston Churchill/ Boris Johnson). Churchill is Mr. Johnson’s hero – he wrote a book on him a few years ago: “The Churchill Factor: How one man made history.” He may yet succeed May and lead Britain to a full Brexit.
US PRESIDENT TURNING THE WORLD UPSIDE DOWN
Mr. Trump was criticized for getting involved in British domestic affairs. In an interview after his visit to the UK, he was asked who is America’s biggest “foe.” He replied that the EU is the biggest foe of the US at this time.
This followed his attendance in Brussels at the NATO conference, at which he threatened to pull America out of NATO if European countries do not contribute more to the military organization.
Not all EU countries are members of NATO. The EU is a major trading organization, whereas NATO is a military alliance. Within the space of a few days, Mr. Trump criticized the two organizations that have been pillars of the Western Alliance for many decades. An immediate consequence was the EU signing a trade agreement with Japan. The EU is already China’s largest trading partner, and China is the EU’s second largest trade partner after the US. The EU, China and Japan are busy building closer ties as the US turns away.
Mr. Trump ended his European trip with a visit to Helsinki to meet with Russia’s President Putin. This was the most shocking meeting of all with the US president seeming to support Mr. Putin against his own intelligence services, Putin denying that Russia interfered in the US election. Mr. Trump has backtracked on his claim, now supporting his intelligence services; but has followed all this by inviting Putin to Washington in the autumn.
It’s no exaggeration to say that the President of the United States, in just a few days, turned the world upside down.
The late Secretary of State, Dean Acheson, wrote a memoir of his years in the diplomatic service after World War II when America built the present world order. He gave the book the title: “Present at the Creation”, published in 1969. It would be appropriate now for somebody involved in current events, to write a sequel: “Present at the Destruction.”
The seventy-year global world order put together mostly by America and Britain is ending. It may take a year or two to see clearly what will replace it.
Students of Bible prophecy have long speculated on the identities of the ten kings (or leaders) who come together to form a revived Roman Empire immediately prior to Christ’s Second Coming.
“The ten horns which you saw are ten kings who have received no kingdom as yet, but they receive authority for one hour as kings with the beast. These are of one mind, and they will give their power and authority to the beast. These will make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, for He is Lord of lords and King of kings; and those who are with Him are called, chosen, and faithful.” (Revelation 17:12-14 NKJV)
There has often been speculation on what exactly will bring them all together. Daniel 11:40-44 suggests it will be a threat from the Middle East.
Likely, nobody thought it would be the President of the United States!
He has been pushing the European members of NATO to increase their contributions to the defense of NATO. It was agreed a few years ago that all would spend at least 2% of their GDP. This is certainly the fairest way to finance the military alliance. But it can be misleading. The British and the Greeks have always spent more than 2% on defense. Why the Greeks? – because of the very serious threat from neighboring Turkey, also a NATO member. They are not spending more on the military to boost NATO.
Now, Mr. Trump is demanding everybody contribute 4% of their GDP. This would more than double the military strength of the European members of NATO. What if they later decided to leave NATO and go it alone? They could equal America’s military power.
President Trump claimed that NATO is financed 90% by the US. This is not true. The highest figure I could find on the internet was 70.1 %, but usually it was a few points lower than that.
There are problems with what might be termed “NATO bashing.”
Firstly, NATO was formed in 1949 following World War II. The idea was to keep the Russians out, the Germans down and the Americans in. The United States, having learned after World War One that isolationism is not a good idea, wanted to make sure it had a permanent presence in Europe. America may be the dominant member of NATO, but it is only one member in a 29-member alliance, arguably the most successful multinational alliance in history.
If NATO falls apart, Americans don’t just go home and carry on American business as usual. An end to NATO will mean the US ceasing to be the world’s dominant power. No longer could the president be labeled as “the leader of the free world,” as the US would not be leading anything.
It should also be remembered that only once in NATO’s seventy-year history has the famous Clause 5 been invoked. This is the clause that says an attack on one country is an attack on all. The only occasion in which all the members came to the aid of one member under attack was on 9/11 when the US itself was under attack. This clause is at the heart of the Washington Treaty, signed by President Truman seven decades ago.
President Trump’s two days in Brussels has had the effect of uniting the Europeans against Washington; and also will, in time ,boost Europe’s defenses.
He gave special attention to Germany, which only spends 1.24% of GDP on defense. Overlooked is the fact that, in the past, nobody wanted Germany to spend more. It has a history of aggressive militarism. Does the West really want to rearm Germany?
After leaving Brussels, Mr. Trump flew across the Channel to visit Prime Minister Theresa May, have tea with Queen Elizabeth and spend the weekend in Scotland.
As I write, I am watching Sky News. It is showing the start of what is expected to be a large anti-Trump demonstration in London. A twenty-foot balloon (costing over $20,000), showing a bloated Trump as a baby in diapers, is flying over London, approved by the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, a Muslim of Pakistani origin. Most demonstrators seem to be upset at US immigration policies and specifically at the separation of families at the border. This policy has now been ended. As European countries are finally doing something about illegal immigration, perhaps these demonstrators could turn their attention elsewhere!
It’s rather hypocritical for demonstrators to criticize Trump’s comments on Brexit, when he is not British; while they are condemning his immigration policies when they do not live in the US. The demonstration is not as big as expected – a Sky News poll this morning showed most British people in agreement with the US president on key issues.
It is certainly not in the UK’s interest to upset Mr. Trump at this point in time.
President Trump’s visit is colliding with a domestic crisis over Brexit. A week ago today Mrs. May met with her Cabinet to discuss a united approach to negotiations with the EU. Britain is set to leave the organization in March of next year, less than nine months away.
Although the majority of people in the UK voted to leave the EU, Mrs. May did not. Her proposals would tie the United Kingdom to the European Union, even though it would not be a voting member, making it the worst of both worlds. The Foreign Secretary, Boris Johnson, resigned along with some others. Mr. Johnson said that the UK would become a “colony” under May’s proposals. Mrs. May’s government could fall at any time, as she does not have a majority in parliament and this issue is the most contentious issue the country has faced for a long time.
Enter Mr. Trump.
In an interview in one of Britain’s trashiest newspapers (the Sun), Mr. Trump criticizes May for not following his advice in negotiations with the EU. He even went so far as to say that his friend, Boris Johnson, would make a great prime minister! Mr. Trump is also friends with Nigel Farage, who led the Brexit campaign. The US president does not hide the fact that he supports Brexit, but interference in another country’s internal affairs is unprecedented and could backfire, with British voters turning against Brexit following the president’s comments.
But Trump’s visit could also be timely – if he offers London a generous trading agreement.
He has, however, made it clear that it will only be possible if the UK completely breaks away from the EU.
Are we seeing the continental countries grouping around Germany while the US and UK go their own way? Again, long time Bible students have known this is part of the final global scenario. It’s taking time to get there, but world events are moving in that direction.
Footnote: Mrs. May has just spoken with President Trump beside her and announced that, after leaving the EU in March, the US and UK “will pursue an ambitious UK-US free trade agreement.” They were speaking at Chequers, the prime minister’s country home.
On Thursday evening, the president was entertained at a black tie dinner at Blenheim Palace, the birthplace of Sir Winston Churchill, at the request of the president.
Monday, July 16th, marks the 100th anniversary of the assassinations of the Romanov family, Czar Nicholas II, his wife and children, plus their servants.
A few weeks ago, I said I gave up on television news when my grandson, aged 5, made a remark about how nasty everybody is. Today, I’m back to watching while I write this blog. There are two reasons for this – Sky News (from the UK) and the young soccer team trapped in a cave in Thailand. As we no longer have cable, Sky is a real treat – a free 24/7 news channel with no sensationalism, no shouting and few commercials. It has more international content than US TV channels, though not as much as the BBC, which has more foreign correspondents than any other source.I recommend it to those of you who have also “cut the cord.”
There’s a great deal going on in the world right now. The implications are quite profound for almost all countries.
Next week, President Trump will be attending the NATO summit in Brussels. The 70th anniversary of the alliance is coming up. After seven decades of working together to maintain the peace of the western world, the 29-nation military grouping is facing its biggest challenge yet: President Trump.
The US president is adamant that European countries need to contribute more, a justifiable demand on the part of the US Administration. But, perhaps a greater challenge is growing indifference to the alliance in the US as increasing numbers of people turn isolationist. Americans are focused primarily on their own problems.
Today’s Economist led with the following words: “The Western alliance is breaking apart.”
The collapse of NATO will quickly lead to radical change and realignments in Europe; ultimately leading to the fulfillment of Revelation 17.
President Trump will be visiting the UK after the NATO summit. His “working” visit will include meetings with Prime Minister Theresa May and Queen Elizabeth.
EU SECURITY TIES
No country can replace the US in the short term, but European countries are certainly moving in the direction of closer security ties. NATO was formed to keep the Russians out, the Americans in and the Germans down! Russia is no longer the greatest threat to European security. Note the following comment:
‘Europe today is not afraid of Vladimir Putin reaching the Rhine. Europe is afraid of Africa and the Middle East reaching the Danube.” (“The Never-Trumpers are never coming back,” Pat Buchanan, 7/6).
Attitudes are certainly changing on the continent: “In Italy, rising popular sentiment against immigration has found a forceful spokesman and leader in (Deputy PM Matteo) Salvini, who has refused entry to Italian ports to migrant rescue ships, saying “NGO rescue ships will only see Italy on postcards.”
Nations are increasingly working together to keep the Muslims out. Others are still letting them in.
TRADE WAR BEGINS
“The U.S. and China slapped levies on $34 billion of each other’s exports, the first tangible shots in a trade battle that both sides are bracing to fight for months – if not years.” (WSJ 7/6).
NHS @ 70
The British are proud of their National Health Service (NHS). Everybody in the country, at least in theory, has equal access to free health care, which costs 9.8% of GDP. Conservatives, Liberals and Socialists in the UK all support the NHS, competing with each other to promise increased funding.
“In 2014, Britain spent 9.8 per cent of its GDP on healthcare, compared to the average for the EU . . . of 9.7 per cent.” (ft.com).
In contrast, the US spent 17.9 % of its GDP on healthcare last year, almost twice as much per person and with no better results.
Over the last 70 years, the NHS has provided free health care for all British citizens. But it has some serious problems:
A shortfall of 100,000 doctors and nurses, who can often earn more in other countries.
After 70 years of the NHS, people were asked in a recent poll if they thought it would last another 70 years. Over two-thirds said “No.”
“The NHS is drowning in bureaucracy”, a report noted in 2015.
Rising costs are due to: recent medical developments that are very costly; an increasing number of elderly. 55% of all the money allocated to the NHS is spent on people over 85; foreign nationals taking advantage of the system. Can no way be found to make them pay up BEFORE receiving treatment? They can’t buy petrol at the pump without paying in advance – perhaps the petrol companies can help the NHS here?
Each year, the cost of the NHS increases by 8%; but the economy only grows at a 2% rate. This means that the NHS is unsustainable.
Mrs. May is promising the medical service an additional 20 billion pounds ($26.6 billion), out of the savings the country will make as a result of Brexit.
This will not solve the problem long-term.
REALITY CHECK: The same government that introduced the NHS started dismantling the British Empire and reducing the UK’s military power. There IS a connection. Military cuts have combined with increased medical bills over the last 70 years. If the country cannot defend itself, there will be no NHS!
As I write, Theresa May, UK Prime Minister, is trying to keep her Cabinet together as she draws up Britain’s final Brexit offer. They are all meeting at Chequers, the Prime Minister’s country home not far from London. The country is due to leave the European Union in March of next year. Many members of the Cabinet are concerned she will give too much away and tie Britain to the EU for decades to come. The worst-case scenario is that Britain will become a European vassal state, constantly having to follow orders from Berlin. Can’t the country find another Winston Churchill?
CANADA: “Canada’s Supreme Court has banned Christian schools and colleges from teaching Biblical values because the Bible does not support the Trudeau government’s vision of “diversity” and is therefore “harmful” to LGBT and Muslim students.
“Instead, Canada’s schools have been encouraged to adopt Common Core values such as ordering children as young as six to question their sexual orientation and gender identity, while teaching them how to use a range of vegetables as sex toys, and promoting anal sex as “normal.”
“Christian colleges and universities will be stripped of their accreditation if they continue to promote Biblical standards and values. In other words, the highest Canadian court has ruled that Christianity and education are incompatible. ” (“Canada Bans Christianity from the classroom”, Ray Pennings, 6/15, National Post)
Rumors have long persisted that Queen Elizabeth was not as involved as she perhaps should have been in her children’s lives, especially when they were young.
In his controversial 1994 authorized biography of Prince Charles, Jonathan Dimbleby quotes the Prince of Wales saying it was “inevitably the nursery staff” who taught him to play, witnessed his first steps, and punished and rewarded him, as they are who took care of him.
But Princess Anne has publicly refuted any claim that her mother was an absent parent. “I simply don’t believe there is any evidence whatsoever to suggest that she wasn’t caring. It just beggars belief,” the Princess Royal said.
Indeed, Elizabeth II, who has four children, eight grandchildren, and seven great-grandchildren (including newborns Lena Tindall and little Prince Louis) once described motherhood as “the only job which matters.” (The Royal News from Town and Country, 7/6).
GAY CONVERSION THERAPY TO BE BANNED IN UK
“Gay conversion “therapies” are based on the premise that being gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender is a mental illness that can be “cured.” But there is no evidence that they work, and the techniques are largely discredited. Members of UK professional bodies for counseling and psychotherapy are prohibited from using such techniques.” (CNN) The government believes that the therapies are harmful and have driven some to suicide.
“The ten horns which you saw are ten kings who have received no kingdom as yet, but they receive authority for one hour as kings with the beast. These are of one mind, and they will give their power and authority to the beast. These will make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, for He is Lord of lords and King of kings; and those who are with Him are called, chosen, and faithful.” (Rev 17:12-14)
For these ten nations to come together, there must be a major upheaval that transforms the nations of the world and their alliances. President Trump may be the catalyst.
It’s difficult to know at this point what the outcome of the Singapore summit will be. North Korea’s Kim Jong Un and US President Donald Trump seemed to get along fine and there is hope of an end to almost 70 years of conflict on the Korean peninsula.
“President Donald Trump’s summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un hearkens back to an era of high-risk summits where the outcome was not preordained.” (“In the past, summits often redrew maps, changed world,” Gregory Korte, USA Today, 6/13)
“ . . . To Trump’s credit, we are surely at a better place than we were a year ago when Kim was testing hydrogen bombs and ICBMs, and he and Trump were trading threats and insults in what seemed the prelude to a new Korean War.
“Whatever one may think of his diplomacy, Trump has, for now, lifted the specter of nuclear war from the Korean peninsula and begun a negotiating process that could lead to tolerable coexistence.” (“Trump’s Bold Historic Gamble,” Pat Buchanan, 6/15)
For a more critical view, note this paragraph from The Economist: “In foreign policy, perhaps more than anywhere else, President Donald Trump is doing exactly what he said he would do: he has pulled out of the Paris climate agreement and the Iran deal, moved America’s embassy in Israel and imposed tariffs on imports. His supporters, and many business folk, are thrilled. But though his wrecking-ball approach may bring short-term wins for America, it will cause long-term damage to the world.” (6/9)
WILL THERE BE PEACE?
In 1938, before the word “summit” was used to describe meetings of world leaders (it was first used by Sir Winston Churchill over ten years later), the two most powerful men in the world met in Munich. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and Germany’s leader, Adolf Hitler, worked out a peace “deal” between them. Mr. Chamberlain was able to return to England and proclaim “Peace in our time.” Less than a year later, the two nations were at war. World War Il was to last six years.
80 years later, the Singapore summit has raised hopes of an end to the threat of nuclear war involving North Korea. But whether this will mean peace remains to be seen.
“Here is where the crunch comes. Kim is being told that he must give up the weapons whose very possession by him are the reason why the world powers are paying him heed.” (PB)
Meanwhile, it is becoming clear that neither North Korea nor the United States are the biggest beneficiaries following the summit. The nation that benefits the most is China, already the greatest power in the Far East.
A HUGE WIN FOR CHINA
“Kim Jong Un flew into Singapore on a Chinese plane for his summit with US President Donald Trump and left with a prized concession long sought by Beijing: the suspension of US-South Korean war games.
Not only that, but Trump also teased the possibility of a complete withdrawal of American troops from the Korean Peninsula at some point in the near future.
“It’s a huge win for China,” Bonnie Glaser, director of the China Power Project at CSIS, told CNN.” (CNN, 6/3)
Mr. Trump clearly wants to reduce the number of US military personnel in South Korea, variously said to be 28,000-32,000. At a press conference, he said the following:
“I want to get our soldiers out. I want to bring our soldiers back home. We have 32,000 soldiers in South Korea. I would like to be able to bring them back home. . . . We will stop the war games, which will save us a tremendous amount of money.”
As said on CNN, this statement is exactly what China wants. Under pressure from Beijing, North Korea will likely take a more peaceful course. The country will likely open up to some foreign investment, mostly from China, although there is little prospect of an end to authoritarian, communist rule. China itself has not made any progress in that area.
It may take some time for the world to see clearly that this summit was a big step forward for China and Chinese power in the Asia-Pacific region. Perhaps mindful of the decline of the European powers in the region following World War II, China is enabling the US to decline gracefully in what is increasingly a Chinese sphere of influence. Even the summit venue, Singapore, is ethnically Chinese. A friend of mine in the city-state reports an increased sighting of Chinese ships around the strategically important island.
On the day of the summit, the Singapore Straits Times reported:
PARIS (AFP) – “France is increasing its military presence in the Indo-Pacific region, sending warships through the South China Sea and planning air exercises to help counter China’s military build-up in disputed waters.
“In late May, the French assault ship Dixmude and a frigate sailed through the disputed Spratly Islands and around a group of reefs that China has turned into islets, to push back against Beijing’s claim to own most of the resource-rich South China Sea.”
Around the globe, the talk was of peace; but the summit was largely about money, as is so often the case with global power struggles.
Although the US economy is doing well, the country is heavily in debt (more about that later), while China has mountains of cash. Inevitably, the latter is going to overtake the former, at least in Asia, unless things change fast.
EU & NATO CONCERNS
“Donald Trump’s America-first diplomacy has shaken the foundations of many global institutions and alliances, but its most damaging effects so far have been on the trans-Atlantic relationship. The community of North American and European nations forming the nucleus of the alliance that won the Cold War for the West is closer to breaking up now than any time since the 1940s.” (“Why Trump clashes with Europe,” by Walter Russell Mead, WSJ, 6/12).
The summit of the G7 nations, meeting in Quebec just a few days ago, ended in disarray when the US president refused to sign the joint communiqué and walked out of the conference. The future of the organization remains in doubt. The G7 was sometimes referred to last week as the G6+1; at other times the G4, as only the European countries seemed to be in agreement.
By throwing out the suggestion that all tariffs be abolished, Mr. Trump was undermining the very foundations of the European Union.
Early in July, the US president will be attending the NATO summit in Brussels. It should become clearer then if he feels any support for the European democracies. If he doesn’t, Europe will be on its own.
The German news magazine Der Spiegel commented on the “G7 fiasco,” saying “it’s time to isolate Donald Trump:”
“The G-7 summit once again made it clear that U.S. President Donald Trump is intent on treating America’s allies worse than its enemies. Europe must draw the consequences and seek to isolate Trump on the international stage.”
“Germany’s foreign minister called for the European Union to become a more self-confident global actor, prepared to take counter-measures when the United States crosses “red lines” and able to respond to Russian threats and Chinese growth.
“In a Berlin speech, Heiko Maas gave the clearest sign yet that Germany no longer sees its 70-year-old alliance with the United States as unconditional, and threw his weight behind French proposals to make the EU shipshape for a more uncertain world.
“We need a balanced partnership with the US,” he told youth activists in a converted railway station, “where we as Europeans act as a conscious counterweight when the US oversteps red lines.”
“In remarks that drew a line under the post-war German doctrine of close alignment with the United States, Maas listed President Donald Trump’s Washington as a challenge for Europe, alongside more traditional rivals like Russia and China.
“Donald Trump’s egotistical politics of ‘America First’, Russia’s attacks on international law and state sovereignty, the expansion of gigantic China: the world order we were used to – it no longer exists,” he said.
“The speech is the latest in a flurry of declarations by leading German politicians digesting the implications of the disarray following Trump’s abrupt departure last week from the Quebec G7 summit, long a pillar of the US-led Western global order.
“Earlier this week, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, long known as among Germany’s most committed Atlanticists, effectively demoted the US relationship in a television interview by saying Germany’s second loyalty had to be the EU.
“The first loyalty goes to your own country,” she said. “But the second should go to the EU.” For Berlin’s elites, the EU and the transatlantic alliance were long regarded as equal pillars.” (Euractiv with Reuters 6/14)
Once again, money has played a part in Mr. Trump’s anti-European rhetoric. Although some European countries do spend more than the required 2% of their GNP on defense, some do not, including Germany. Mr. Trump feels very strongly that this is wrong and needs to change. The United States is deeply in debt. In itself, this poses a grave threat to national security. Other nations must devote more of their resources to defense.
Did both the Singapore and the Quebec summits have a lot to do with money? Seemingly so.
ONE SUMMIT STILL TO GO
Here’s a final comment from a British conservative publication, linking all three summits (G7, Singapore and NATO):
“Donald Trump is feeling confident about world peace following his big summit in Singapore with Kim Jong Un. But . . . western leaders are desperately worried. Might the US President, inebriated on his own sense of destiny, be about to collapse Nato? Theresa May is certainly worried: she knows how hard the British government had to push Trump to officially endorse Nato. But now, following the fallout over tariffs at last weekend’s G7 summit in Canada, Trump is not feeling well disposed towards the rest of the West. Next month’s Nato Summit in Brussels will be a tense affair.” (Spectator, UK, 6/14)
Seventy years after the formation of NATO, could the organization break up? We will see next month.
"Once in a while you will stumble upon the truth but most of us manage to pick ourselves up and hurry along as if nothing had happened." — Sir Winston Churchill