“Many Americans often ask me the same question: What about the Muslim family next door who are really nice people?

“To this question my answer has always been:  Some of the nicest people I know are Muslims, but that must never blind us from understanding the risk we are taking when we allow the building of hundreds of mosques financed by Saudi Arabia and allow millions of Muslims to migrate into America at a time of a fierce war against Islamic terrorist groups and nations.

“The existence of nice and educated Muslims should also never blind us from seeing the deep problems with the ideology of Islam and its jihadist goals that are enshrined deep in the psyche of Muslims.

“Yes, our problem is with the Muslim jihadists, but so-called “moderate” Muslims have often been silent enablers and defenders. Terrorists could never be as powerful as they are without the support and prayers of Islamic nations, governments and people.”

“Islam is the only religion on earth where the followers are required to kill Allah’s enemies and do revenge in his name. The Quran also says that vengeance and retaliation has been prescribed for Muslims.”
(“Muslims should rise up and reject terrorism,”by Nonie Darwish, Investor’s Business Daily, April 22nd)


Daily Telegraph

“The mind goes numb. Spanish unemployment jumped by yet another 237,000 people in the first quarter to 6.2 million, or 27.2pc.

“This is equivalent to roughly 8.3 million in Britain, or 39 million in the United States. The country is losing 3,581 jobs a day. There are 1.9m households where no member of the family has a job.”

“The national rate of unemployed youth is 57.2pc, rising to 70pc in the Canaries.

“This is in spite of mass emigration by Spanish youth. El Pais reports that 260,000 young people aged between 16 and 30 left the country last year.”

(“The great Spanish nation can end its crucifixion at will by leaving EMU”, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Daily Telegraph (UK) 25th April)



Assuming that Lansing, Michigan, is typical of national trends, there’s a crisis brewing when it comes to student loans.

Lansing is the home of Lansing Community College.  East Lansing, a city that borders Lansing, is home to Michigan State University, so higher education is a big factor in the local economy.  Not too far away is Ann Arbor, home of the University of Michigan.  Both universities are Big Ten universities here in the US.

These institutions of higher learning hardly suffered after the financial collapse in 2008.   A friend once described Ann Arbor as “a reality free zone.”  But reality has a habit of eventually catching up on people, institutions and countries.  They can’t avoid trouble forever.

“Student loan defaults on rise at LCC” ran a headline in today’s Lansing State Journal (April 26th).  “The recession years brought a boom in enrollment to Lansing Community College and a boom in borrowing.”  IOW, they did not suffer like the rest of us.

Continuing:  “In 2007-08, the year before the markets collapsed, LCC students took out just under $29 million in federal student loans.  Three years later, that number topped $68 million.  More borrowers were borrowing more money.”

Ironically, the reason why more borrowers borrowed more money was the recession itself.  People lost their jobs and went back to school for further training.  (That, of course, has led to a great deal of disappointment as, upon graduation, the jobs aren’t there, leaving many to feel higher education is not worth it.  That could be a further problem for colleges and universities in the future.)

Anyway, “of the 3,779 former LCC students who began repaying their student loans between October 1, 2009 and September 30th of the following year, 653 of them went into default over the next two years.  That’s 17.2 % . . .”

A few weeks ago, it was announced that student loan debt had reached over $1 trillion.   The President promised to do something about it, which, likely, will simply result in government taking over some of that debt, adding to the country’s financial woes.

What’s needed is a deeper look at this problem.

A television news program this week showed that thousands of Americans are now moving to Canada for higher education as the cost is roughly a quarter of what American institutions charged.  That’s a staggering difference.  While the rest of the country had to economize after the financial crash, academic institutions continued to raise their prices for tuition, room and board, as if nothing had happened.

Is it possible that student loans in the US have actually enabled higher education to keep charging more, knowing that the kids can always borrow the money from Uncle Sam?   Never mind the kids, after they get a degree, they will be earning good money and will happily pay it all back!

However, that’s not happening any more.

Millions of young people can’t find a well paid job, can’t afford to buy their own place so they go back to Mom and Dad, can’t afford to marry and start a family, hence the falling birthrate.  Post-WWII expectations are no longer guaranteed.

Student loans are only part of the problem.  But they are a large part of it.

What’s surprising is that the local rate of defaults is only 17.2%.

At some point this bubble is going to burst and the consequences could be worse than when the housing bubble burst in 2006.


Riots in Madrid against austerity
Riots in Madrid against austerity measures

The news today that the United Kingdom managed to avoid a triple dip recession during the first quarter of the year comes as a boost to morale, even though the growth rate, at 0.3%, is pathetic.  0.4% less and everybody would be lamenting the triple dip.  (Question:  are stats reliable enough to measure growth that accurately?)

The UK isn’t the only country in the European Union struggling economically.  There is even greater suffering across the water in the Eurozone countries, those European nations that use the euro as their common currency.

Spain’s unemployment rate has risen again to 27.2%, over six million people; while the rate for those 25 and under is a staggering 57%.  At the same time, the French unemployment rate has just grown for the 23rd month in a row.

It’s not surprising that the public is losing confidence in the European Union, which is failing to deliver on its promises.  There is little or no confidence in the austerity measures that some countries have introduced. An article in Wednesday’s Guardian (UK) highlights the problems:

“Public confidence in the European Union has fallen to historically low levels in the six biggest EU countries, raising fundamental questions about its democratic legitimacy more than three years into the union’s worst ever crisis, new data shows.

“After financial, currency and debt crises, wrenching budget and spending cuts, rich nations’ bailouts of the poor, and surrenders of sovereign powers over policymaking to international technocrats, Euroscepticism is soaring to a degree that is likely to feed populist anti-EU politics and frustrate European leaders’ efforts to arrest the collapse in support for their project.

“Figures from Eurobarometer, the EU’s polling organisation, analysed by the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), a thinktank, show a vertiginous decline in trust in the EU in countries such as Spain, Germany and Italy that are historically very pro-European.

“The six countries surveyed – Germany, France, Britain, Italy, Spain, and Poland – are the EU’s biggest, jointly making up more than two out of three EU citizens or around 350 million of the EU’s 500 million population.

“The findings, published exclusively in the Guardian in Britain and in collaboration with other leading newspapers in the other five countries, represent a nightmare for Europe’s leaders, whether in the wealthy north or in the bailout-battered south, suggesting a much bigger crisis of political and democratic legitimacy.”  (“Crisis for Europe as trust hits record low”, Ian Traynor, Europe editor of the Guardian, 24 April).

Things do not look good for the European Union, a 27-nation democratic club that has helped Europe avoid conflict for over 50 years. Will the EU survive? Or will it fall apart?  If the latter, what will replace it?

It’s important to remember that, while there are similarities between Europe and the US, there are also some major differences. Chiefly, that whereas the United States has been a unitary nation, a federal republic, without a serious blip for almost 150 years, since the end of the Civil War, European countries have seen a great deal of turmoil in that time period.

150 years ago, most of the nations that currently comprise the European Union, were monarchies, or ruled over by imperial monarchies like Austria or Russia. During the last 15 decades, they have experienced social upheaval, wars, and revolutions in a way that America hasn’t. The United Kingdom is an exception, being stable for over three centuries.

The point here is that we should not necessarily expect democracy as we know it to continue on the continent of Europe. Can Spain really withstand 27.2 % unemployment?  Many Spaniards must remember the dictatorship of General Franco, which only ended I n 1975.  There must be nostalgia amongst some for a return to the conditions that then existed, prior to the EU.  This will also be the case in Portugal and Greece, where fascist dictatorships ended about the same time.

The peoples of the former communist countries of eastern Europe will also be looking back nostalgically to the time of full employment, under communism.  Of course, they never really had full employment, but every citizen had a responsibility given them by the state, even if it was only sweeping the streets.

Change does not have to be the result of economic problems.  There is a sense among many Europeans that politicians have imposed a racially mixed society upon them against their will. There is also disillusionment with radical changes in society like gay marriage (see quote below this article).  There is little or no trust in government or its institutions.

European history teaches us that violent upheaval can suddenly come, overthrowing a regime overnight.  France in July 1789, Russia in February 1917 are the two most notable examples. But, remember, in 1848 virtually the whole continent experienced revolution as uprisings toppled almost every government, or forced radical change upon their leaders. In 1989 something similar happened in the East, when communist regimes fell like dominoes.

Let us not be naïve in assuming that now these countries have democracy, they will stay that way.  When democracies fail to provide basic needs, like employment and housing, people will look for alternatives.  At such a time, any demagogue or rabble-rouser can promise paradise and they will believe it.

In Russia, a 300-year-old dynasty was overthrown as a result of a shortage of bread and the riot that resulted from it.  Twenty, forty or sixty years of democracy can suddenly change.  Everybody knows enough history to be aware that Europe hasn’t always been democratic – it can easily be non-democratic again!


“Paris:  Revolutions are often sparked by an unexpected shock to an already weakened regime. As commentators in France remark not only on the crisis engulfing François Hollande’s government but also on the apparent death-rattle of the country’s entire political system, it could be that his flagship policy of legalising gay marriage — or rather, the gigantic public reaction against it, unique in Europe — will be the last straw that breaks the Fifth -Republic’s back.”

(“Why France’s gay marriage debate has started to look like a revolution,” John Laughland, The Spectator (UK), 27th April).


Hmmm . .

Lexington is a weekly in-depth look at the United States in the Economist magazine.

Commenting on the rejection of gun control legislation after Newtown and the likelihood of any changes in immigration law following the Boston Marathon bombings, the writer of the column included the following observation:

“. . . after living as a reporter on four continents Lexington is confident that America is distinctively conservative, and that this is strikingly apparent in the country’s responses to violence.   Atrocities are deplored, mourned and debated, for sure; but they do not reliably trigger a consensus that society must be remade so that they never happen again.”

(April 20th, 2013)

IOW, don’t expect any changes.  America will stay the course.


From the American Thinker, April 22nd.

“As I read the media coverage and listen to our politicians and security forces’ bland comments and self-congratulations, my anger is rising.  I do not hear any resolve. I do not hear any interest in making sure there are no more Islamic bombings of America.

“Our President praises the public for not being terrorized, then lectures us not to “rush to judgment” about the bombers’ motivations and “certainly not about entire groups of people.”  Translation:  we’re not going to talk about the jihadi war on us.  Hope for the best.  Do not pay attention to the problem of Islamic imperialism.

This is what I want to hear:

There is much that can be done to make sure there is never again an Islamic bombing on American soil and we will do it. We must confront the ideological reach of murderous Islamic imperialism into our immigrant communities.  We will review our immigration policies to make sure we are not issuing residency permits and citizenship to national security risks.  We must reform the laws governing FBI investigations of potential terrorist recruits, so Homeland Security and the FBI can effectively monitor individuals who visit jihadi websites and join local jihadi mosques.”

(We are not serious about stopping Islamic terror by Karin McQuillan)


“Islamic terrorism is considered a social problem in Europe. Ask an expert and they’ll talk your ear off about unemployment, racism, overcrowded housing and the same long list of reasons used to explain urban crime. The United States is slowly coming around to that same point of view.

“Forget the great debate between whether people kill people or guns kill people. The conclusion reached by most governments before your grandfather was born is that social conditions kill people.”

“A tribal war in Boston” by Daniel Greenfield, the Jewish Press, April 23rd.



Immigration 2

The Boston Marathon bombings show yet again the need for immigration reform.

Not the kind of reform now being discussed, reform which would eventually allow 11 million illegal aliens to gain citizenship, but reform which would keep America’s enemies out!

The two men responsible for the bombings are Chechens, Muslims from southern Russia.

The 19 men responsible for 9/11 were Muslims from Saudi Arabia.

The killings of 13 people at Ft. Hood were perpetrated by a second generation Jordanian Muslim; just as the London bombings in July, 2005, were committed by second generation Muslims, young men from an affluent background, so poverty was not the cause.  These attacks are significant because they show that some people born in western countries of immigrant parents may not assimilate.  Rather, they become radicalized, anti-American and extremist in their views.

It’s not too difficult to understand why.  America is built on a foundation of freedom.   Islam means submission, which is the exact opposite of freedom.  The two cannot be reconciled, no matter what the multiculturalists may say.  Of course, America’s concept of freedom is more like license today, as anything goes in the moral arena.  This is deeply offensive to conservative religions, including Islam.  At a time when most Americans are turning away from religion, Muslim immigrants and their children seem increasingly inclined to embrace strict religious beliefs.

Across the Islamic world people believe they are in a war with the “Christian” West, with America being the chief Christian nation.  Whereas western nations allow Muslims to immigrate, no Muslim nations allow Christians to move in.  Muslim countries are even driving out those Christians who have lived amongst them for centuries.

It’s not just Muslims who commit acts of violence.  In 2007 a South Korean immigrant killed almost forty people on the campus of Virginia Tech.

Ethnic violence is the norm throughout much of the world.  Ethnic conflict is often exacerbated by religious conflict.

Watch a good world news program any evening and you will see that these conflicts dominate the news.  On Monday, April 22nd, BBC News America led with developments that followed the Boston Marathon perpetrated by Muslim extremists, progressed through a report from Canada that the Canadian police had thwarted terrorist activity by foreign-born Muslims, Syria’s civil war (increasingly seen as a major conflict between Sunni and Shia Muslims), Burma (anti-Muslim violence by Burmese nationals) and Israeli security concerns following attacks from Gaza.  There were only two other reports on non-Muslim related topics.

Before 1965, US immigration policy was discriminatory in an attempt to maintain the racial balance that already existed.  Change approved that year by the Johnson administration opened the doors to massive immigration from all countries, regardless of religion or ethnicity.   We can see the results today.  Clearly, many of those immigrants are not assimilating.

The change in the law has opened America up to the same ethnic and religious divisions that exist in many other parts of the world.

As a result, terrorist attacks like 9/11 and the Boston Marathon are likely to become more common.  We are also likely to see more terrorism by white supremacist groups that resent the changes that have taken place.

"Once in a while you will stumble upon the truth but most of us manage to pick ourselves up and hurry along as if nothing had happened." — Sir Winston Churchill