BRITISH-ISRAEL’S CALL FOR A FAST

The British-Israel World Federation (BIWF) has called a fast for this Saturday for the peoples of “the Covenant Nations.”

The British-Israelites formed their federation in 1919, but their beliefs can be traced back to the previous century.   As the British Empire expanded during Queen Victoria’s reign and America was spreading westward fulfilling its “manifest destiny,” so the number of believers grew.   Their belief is based on God’s promises to Israel in Genesis 48, that the two sons of his son Joseph would grow into a “company of nations” and “a great nation” – the British Empire and the United States of America.

It was a widely-held belief in the trenches of World War I, when men from all over the British Empire fought against Imperial Germany.   The losses were so great that people became disillusioned with both religion and the empire.

As Britons turned increasingly away from their Christian heritage, so BIWF lost some support.   The organization was supported by some prominent members of the British establishment, the most famous of which was Princess Alice, one of Queen Victoria’s granddaughters.   In the 1930’s, as the Countess of Athlone, she was married to the Governor-General of South Africa; from 1940, following the sudden death of John Buchan, the popular Governor-General of Canada, she and her husband moved to Canada in war time, so that he could serve there, replacing John Buchan.   They remained in Canada until 1946.   On two occasions, they hosted President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Winston Churchill at Rideau Hall, the official residence of the Governor-General.   King George VI, father of Queen Elizabeth II, also made supportive statements reflecting a belief in BI.   A former prime minister of New Zealand was also a member.  They have branches in a number of countries, including all the “covenant nations”.

The idea still persists, in spite of Wikipedia’s claim that the theory has been disproved, for which they give no evidence.   Yair Davidy’s Brit-Am organization in Israel supports the theory with archaeological evidence.     An American organization called “Truth in History” publishes a magazine, which also upholds the teaching. Additionally, the Churches of God that came out of Herbert W Armstrong’s Worldwide Church of God, continue to believe – their interpretation of prophecy is heavily influenced by British-Israelism.

Some are dogmatic in their support of BI, while others are equally dogmatic in their dismissal of the belief.   There are those who believe the evidence supporting BI is overwhelming, but there are others who don’t consider it conclusive and reject the teaching.

Whether you believe the theory or not is largely irrelevant.   The fact Is that the “covenant nations” are in deep trouble, hence the call for a fast.   Coincidentally, the date chosen for the fast is also the Jewish Day of Atonement, the holiest day of the year for Jews.   On this day, believers are expected to fast completely, abstaining from all food and drink.   The idea is for everybody to humble themselves before God, to be “at-one” with God, through prayer and Bible Study, as well as worshipping Him with others of like mind.

It’s also a day for repentance.   Repentance means to change, to overcome sin and return to God with great fervor.   It’s unlikely that the peoples of the “covenant nations” will go that far.

Followers of BI believe that Ephraim is the ancestor of the British peoples and nations that became dominions after independence (Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa).   Note what God said to Ephraim in Hosea 7:8-10:

“Ephraim has mixed himself among the peoples; Ephraim is a cake unturned.   Aliens have devoured his strength, but he does not know it, yes, gray hairs are here and there on him, yet he does not know it. And the pride of Israel testifies to his face, but they do not return to the LORD their God, nor seek Him for all this.”

A little over seventy years ago, the descendants of Joseph, the peoples of the covenant nations, the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic peoples, dominated the globe.   The British Empire and the United States had emerged victorious after World War II and it seemed as if God had given them supremacy all over the globe.   But things started to go wrong immediately. The British lost their empire in the twenty years after the war; and the United States and Britain now seem unable to win any conflicts.

The Commonwealth has largely unraveled and may not survive the death of the Queen and ascension of her son, Prince Charles.

Certainly, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand are not as close as they once were.   They no longer form an effective military force and no longer see themselves as fulfilling a common destiny. They have also taken in millions of people from other cultures who do not share the same values inherited from Britain.  (“Ephraim has mixed himself among the peoples”;  “aliens have devoured his strength.”)

At the present time, the greatest threat comes from Brexit and this is why BIWF has called for a fast.   Brexit negotiations are not going well.   The United Kingdom seems to be intimidated by the European Union, lacking in self-confidence, its stance somewhat reminiscent of Neville Chamberlain prior to World War II.  (“Grey hairs are here and there upon him, yet he knows it not.”)

BIWF’s call for a fast and a day of prayer has this to say about Brexit: “On 29th March 2017, Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty was triggered for the United Kingdom to leave the European Union.   We need to pray that the LORD will deliver the United Kingdom completely from the Babylonish EU as the difficult negotiations proceed.”

BIWF publishes a book called “We Have a Guardian” recording historical evidence that shows God’s intervention to help Britain in times of trouble.   “Dunkirk” was one example in 1940.   They are calling for God to intervene again, to save Britain through Brexit and to restore the country to its former self, when many of the people were devout Christians.   They are mindful of the Queen’s Coronation Oath, to maintain the laws of God and the true religion, two promises that all the queen’s governments in each of her dominions have conveniently forgotten.

They are also mindful of the threat to the United States and the rest of the world posed by North Korea, calling upon their members to pray about the situation so that a devastating war can be avoided. Such a war would finish off North Korea, but may also set back the United States, allowing other nations to fill the vacuum.

Remember to pray for your country on this fast day.

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “BRITISH-ISRAEL’S CALL FOR A FAST”

  1. Shows that the ucg are not the only ones who have the truth on modern Israel john may gave a great sermon that all churches should hear and believe throne of David

  2. Most of the churches of God that left WCG believe in BI. No one has ever said that UCG is the only one believing in it. Btw, there are some ministers and brethren in UCG who question it or do not believe it. Conversely, there are those in certain CoG groups who believe it even though their group does not sanction it.

  3. Alex the research in relation to the theory that the British royal family is descended from the house of David is inconclusive and in my opinion false. The belief that the prophet Jeremiah traveled to Ireland with his scribe Baruch and a daughter of King Zedekiah of Judah is pure legend. There is no definitive evidence whatsoever proving this as an historical fact. And besides the Davidic monarchy, like the genealogies of the Old and New Testaments and of Christ Jesus Himself, was patrilineal, that is, the throne was transferred from father to son, never a woman, which is one point that invalidates the view that the British monarchy is of King David. Even Talmudic Jews today profess the opposite, that is, one is considered a “Jew” through the maternal line, which is contrary to the Bible record. Of course, this does not in any way undermine the overwhelming evidence in support of the view that the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic and related peoples are descended from Israel.

  4. I would strongly suggest listening to Mr John Ogwyn’s sermon given back during the early 80s on the subject. Now to someone like John, there is no amount of Biblical proof that would ever convince him. I’ve seen this happen way too often in the past few years….once accepted truth becomes foolishness. Personally I believe many who were counted as members of the WWCG we actually just folks who accepted the Sabbath argument and were never actually fully converted.
    Here’s a link to the sermon I mentioned.
    http://www.hwalibrary.com/cgi-bin/get/hwa.cgi?action=getsermon&InfoID=1342445142

    Andy

  5. Andy Schack wrote: “…Now to someone like John, there is no amount of Biblical proof that would ever convince him…”

    On the contrary Andy I am simply trying to follow the example of the Bereans (Acts 17:11) and the exhortation of the apostle Paul to “prove all things” (1 Thes 5:21). As a youth I was introduced to what is commonly known as British-Israelism via Herbert W. Armstrong’s The United States and Britain in Prophecy. It was not until several years later, however, when the Worldwide Church of God, established by Armstrong, abandoned various teachings of his, including British-Israelism, that I chose to study the matter further for myself. Whilst I accept the overwhelming evidence (e.g., archaeological, Biblical, ethnological, historical, etc.) that proves to my satisfaction the theory that the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic and related peoples are descended from the twelve tribes of Israel I remain less than convinced, however, by, what is to me, the questionable evidence used to support the related theory that the British royal family is descended from the house of King David.

    At the risk of repeating myself, the fact that all the genealogies of the Bible including the Davidic monarchy and that of Jesus Christ Himself (e.g. Gn 5:3-32; 11:10-32; 1 Chr 1-9; Mt 1:2-16; Lk 3:23-28) was recorded as patrilineal undermines this theory. As I see it, the theory that Jeremiah traveled to Ireland with his scribe, Baruch, and a princess of the royal house of David is unsupported by the historical records and is, therefore, pure legend. There is much confusion over the identification of Tea, Tea-Tephi, Scota and/or “the daughter of Pharaoh” in the historical annals of Ireland with this supposed royal daughter of King David (Jer 41:10; 43:6) and this has even been confirmed by the BIWF and United Church of God in recent years.

    In my own research, the last documented record of Jeremiah’s whereabouts is Tahpanhes, Egypt. Here, Sir W.M. Flinders Petrie unearthed archaeological evidence in the nineteenth century of a fortress mound known as “the palace of the Jew’s daughter” (Bible Research Handbook, vol. 1, 224.2), which has been identified as the Egyptian residence of the Judahite remnant. If true, where Jeremiah, Baruch and the royal remnant accompanying him traveled after their stay in Egypt, I don’t know. Did Jeremiah and his company die in Egypt? Did he return to Judah and from thence travel elsewhere? Did he go to Babylon? Did he go to Ireland? Nothing more is said of him so all we have to go on is mere speculation. Does this mean the the British royal family is not descended from Judah or David? I don’t know. It’s possible they, along with the other royal houses of Europe are. But, thus far the evidence traditionally used to support the theory that Jeremiah transferred the royal throne of David to Ireland from which the British royal family is supposed to originate is in my opinion false.

    I suggest anyone interested in fact not fiction to do their own research and in this regard I recommend the following links as an example that substantiate the flawed foundation to this theory (
    Jeremiah in Ireland: Fact or Fabrication? and Did the prophet Jeremiah go to Ireland? And in this regard we must bear in mind Paul’s admonition to “neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do” (1 Tm 1:4), no matter how enchanting a theory might seem or how much we want it to be true.

  6. Exactly Doris. John mentioned “historical records”. Well, according to historical records, ie worldly knowledge that insist there is no God, the entire Bible is pure fiction. Try to find a history book used in today’s education that teaches a 7 day creation, the flood, the exodus, Christ’s death and resurrection. That is why I linked to Mr Ogwyn’s sermon, he does an excellent job of using the Bible was his source of knowledge.
    When I was called into God’s church in the late 80s. I “cut my teeth” on Church literature from the late 70s to mid 80s. I learned the Truth and then read all the articles in the WWN about how liberalism crept into the Church in the 70s. Right after I was baptized and began attending services I saw the EXACT same things happening that had gotten the Church off the track in the 70s. In one of Mr Armstrong’s sermons he pointed out that one of the things the liberals did was deny the Truth about the Throne of David and take the US and Brit in Prophecy out of circulation.
    History may not repeat but it certainly rhymes.

    Andy

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s