FERGUSON AND THE GREAT AMERICAN DIVIDE

Ferguson MO

Race is America’s Achilles heel.  It’s also the country’s biggest blind spot.

Both have been evident in Ferguson, Missouri, following the shooting death of an 18-year-old African-American male by a white policeman, in August. The decision by a Grand Jury not to send the policeman to trial led to serious rioting last night, which has continued into a second night.

Racial tension goes back to the very beginning of the nation’s modern history and not just between black and white.

The first British settlement on the shores of North America was at Jamestown, Virginia, in 1607.   Twelve years later, the first African slaves arrived and continued arriving for almost two centuries.

Later in the century, the first major conflict in American history took place. King Philip’s War lasted three years (1675-78) and was, proportionately, the worst conflict the country has ever experienced, surpassing the Revolutionary War of 1775-81 (the second worst) and the North-South conflict (1861-65). All three were civil wars.   The first war resulted in the deaths of 10% of the population of the fledgling colonies. It was a war between the white settlers and Native Americans. Over the next two centuries there would be a great deal of further conflict between whites and Native Americans.

The country would also see more conflict between African-Americans and whites.

Discrimination against non-whites was a root cause of the violence.

In the 1960’s a new approach was favored. The Civil Rights movement addressed discrimination and efforts were put in place to make some fundamental changes. The 1964 Civil Rights Act banned all forms of discrimination. One year later, the Voting Rights Act made it much easier for southern blacks to vote, ending decades of discrimination.   Ironically, race riots erupted in the Watts area of Los Angeles the following day.   One month later, President Lyndon Johnson issued an executive order that required government contractors to take Affirmative Action, granting favor to minorities in employment.

Riots were to continue throughout the decade, emphasizing the bad state of race relations.   Change was clearly necessary.

In 1971, a Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism made some recommendations on assimilation in neighboring Canada. This is considered the origin of multiculturalism, the idea that all races, colors, religions and nationalities can live peacefully and successfully together.   The US picked up the ball and ran with it. Australia, New Zealand and the EU followed. Multiculturalism, sometimes called “diversity,” has been the guiding philosophy of western nations for the last four decades.   Perhaps its greatest achievement in the United States was the election of an African-American to the White House

However, what’s happened in Ferguson shows that diversity is not working as promised.

Not just Ferguson, of course.   America’s inner cities have experienced ethnic conflict for decades. New immigrant groups have battled African-Americans and other new immigrant groups in never-ending gang warfare.

This is where the “blind spot” comes in.

Americans like to think of themselves as a “melting pot,” a term that has been in common usage since 1908.   It’s a reference to how different ethnic groups have been assimilated and become one. However, the term was used to describe the various European ethnic groups that migrated to the country prior to the twentieth century. It is questionable that the melting pot concept is still working.   Some would say it never included African-Americans.

America is such a vast country that it’s easy for whites to escape big cities and move to isolated dormitory towns and suburbs, where they will rarely come into contact with other ethnic groups. So it is possible for people to believe that race relations are harmonious when others feel very differently. Ferguson is a classic example of this.

It’s not just white policemen shooting young black males. There are also frequent incidents of black males randomly killing whites. These are given far less attention by the liberal media. But both show continuing racial tension and conflict.

Trust is seriously lacking.

The United States is not the only country with racial problems.   Ethnic conflict between tribes is a daily occurrence across the continent of Africa; historic conflict between ethnic groups has been a primary cause of wars in Europe; and ancient animosities flare up regularly in Asia.   Is America worse?

Over twenty years ago, the Detroit Free Press sent one of its African-American reporters to South Africa to cover news there in the year leading up to the end of apartheid.   In his dispatches, he observed that race relations were better in apartheid South Africa than in the US, where he lived.   More recently, I viewed a discussion on British television on which a number of people of African descent who had lived in both the US and the UK were asked about their experiences. All agreed they felt race relations were better in Britain.   (It should be noted that Britain has had its share of race riots.)

Jesus Christ predicted rising ethnic tensions at the time of the end of the age. In Matthew 24:7, He said: “nation will rise against nation.” The Greek word used for nation is ethnos, a reference to ethnic groups.   Until a few decades ago, the lid was kept on much ethnic conflict by great powers that ruled over many ethnic groups.   Increasingly, those groups have splintered and now are turning on each other.

Perhaps we are about to find that diversity doesn’t work, that mistrust between the races is still very much a part of our culture and heritage, not just in the United States but elsewhere.   A serious rethink is needed on multiculturalism, as racial harmony cannot be achieved by legislation or coercion. There is a definite possibility that, as a consequence of Ferguson, more laws will be passed to force further integration, which could backfire.

Social programs should also be re-evaluated. LBJ’s War on Poverty, proclaimed fifty years ago this year, offered hope to all poor families, including African-American ones, by setting up a welfare system. However, it is now possible to look back and see that welfare has contributed to the breakdown of the family, a social trend that has been particularly devastating for black families. Nine out of ten African-American boys do not live with their father to the age of 16.   The lack of a significant male presence in their lives encourages criminal activity and is a reason why there is a disproportionate number of African-American males in the US prison system.

There will be more Fergusons. Sadly, more parents of young men, both black and white, will lose their loved ones in violent acts between the races.   More riots will result in more lives lost and more property damage, though there is no sense in driving businesses away.

Race remains America’s Achilles heel – ethnic conflict could bring the country down.   But there are also many examples of whites and blacks working well together. Clearly, more work is needed to improve race relations. The alternative is growing conflict in the years to come.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “FERGUSON AND THE GREAT AMERICAN DIVIDE”

  1. Although race tension is a factor I think a greater cause, (if you look carefully at the interview of the police officer and the reason he was not indicted) Had this youth had any respect for the law he would have stepped out of the road when asked to do so by the police officer thereby avoiding this whole situation. You will find it has everything to do with lack of respect. Youth today ( and in most parts of the world) do not have any respect for their parents, teachers, or any form of authority, or even themselves. The deputy police chief of Los Angeles commented that this lack of respect by youth has led to breeding a generation of sociopaths. (people without conscience)
    I believe it is a criminal offense to discipline your child in the US. You are now paying for this in the worst way, Look at the reason for the escalation of mass shootings, also the underlying cause of this is lack of discipline and respect for others. It is about time you admitted that Dr. Spock was wrong about letting your children run wild.

    1. I believe it is fairly common knowledge that Dr. Spock, himself, came to see the error in what he espoused regarding child rearing. However, it is very difficult, if not impossible, to “unsay” something. His original advice released parents, for the most part, from responsibility.

      Now, responsible parents are undermined by the school systems and the government. When the president’s wife can dictate what this nation’s growing children should (or should I say, “can”?) or shouldn’t (again, “cannot”) eat for lunch at school, when she is anything but an expert on nutrition (and from what I’ve seen and heard, she knows NOTHING!), it is time for responsible parents to do everything they can to get their children OUT of the public school system! Before a deluge of protest comes flooding down on me, I KNOW that this is out of the realm of possibility for many families.

      One of my young granddaughters, several years ago, refused to believe something that I told her . . . which was, by the way, true . . . because her teacher told her something different! Don’t believe your parents or grandparents!! Believe the teacher! Respect for a teacher is one thing, but to refuse to believe a parent or grandparent . . . especially at a very young age . . . is something else, entirely. Don’t even get me started on Common Core!

  2. Peppered throughout this blog post is a term that, in my opinion, perpetuates difference and exclusivity: “African American.” Most blacks in this country are no more African than I am European! Hmmmm . . . This brings to mind a question: What do you consider yourself? One need only listen to you speak and they would assume that you are British. I know that you are an American citizen. Are you also a citizen of England? Can one have dual citizenship? (Di does, doesn’t she?) If one can . . . and even if one can’t, for the purpose of this discussion . . . what would that make you? I would assume a “British American.” Not inappropriate; after all, you were born in England . . . that came first . . . now you are here. How about “American Brit?” I suppose that would depend on the degree to which you have been assimilated into American culture (whatever that REALLY is this far removed from the “melting pot” ideal of so long ago).

    Back to “African American.” They make their identity African, first, American, second. I respect people like Bill Cosby and the actress who was a child actress on The Cosby Show (can’t remember her name) who categorically say that they are NOT African Americans. They are Americans. As I heard the young actress say, “I’m from Louisiana.” I think you, in one place in your blog post, referred to blacks as “Americans of African descent.” That’s appropriate and designates them as Americans first but does not deny PART of their heritage.

    You stated that we elected an African American president. What about his white mother? He is just as much white as he is of African descent, but that gets little, if any mention. They used to be called mulatto, but I suppose to use that term these days would be an offense. Why? It means someone who has one white parent and one black parent. What’s the big deal? They should be proud that their parents bridged the racial divide . . . we’re not affected by the prejudice that afflicts so many!

    To the point of your blog post: In my not-so-humble opinion, multiculturalism does not, by and large, work. Do Muslims want to live in a multicultural society? I think not. They (many, if not most) envision a caliphate with ALL converted to Islam and under Sharia law. Under this president, the policy seems to be “come one, come all.”

    In all fairness, evangelical Christians would like to see all converted to Christianity and living according to their version of “God’s law.”

    I don’t seem to see many Jews who want all the world converted to Judaism, yet their’s is one religion and one ethnicity that SO MANY in this world despise. My impression is, although I could be wrong, that they have, historically, attempted to assimilate, with the exception, for those who are observant, of the practice of their religious traditions. (I realize that, by appearance, those who are Hasidic . . . am I right in this? . . . or Orthodox in the extreme do not appear to assimilate well.). How has attempting to assimilate worked out for MANY of them?! How many times has their extermination been attempted? How many just plain hate them simply because they are Jews?

    I fear that the multicultural implications in this country . . . indeed, in the WORLD . . . go far beyond race.

  3. I wouldn’t say multiculturalism is the root cause of the problem. Rather, it is one of the many avenues through which human sinfulness is exposed. Humans have managed to unjustly discriminate over many superficial differences through history. But surely people who respect God’s revelation about the nature of Mankind (made in God’s image), and repect God’s laws which don’t discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, ought to be able to live in multicultural harmony. Saying “multiculturalism doesn’t work well” is equivalent to saying “humanity doesn’t work well”.

  4. I should have also said—thanks for your article. Well said, I thought. I truly hope America can somehow follow a path towards reconciliation of relationships and unbiased justice. It’s not impossible…

  5. Thanks for the comments. To clarify, both my wife and I have dual citizenship. The US allows this with countries that are of like mind. We travel on US passports. I was brought up in England but, after 25 years in the US, consider myself as American as anybody else, though I still don’t like football.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s